In the last decade, there is a massive shift in the adoption of automated testing practices. Due to which most of the manual handling tests have been wiped out But this change has been so quick that most industry players did not get the chance of implementing it properly. We can hear everyone boasting about the need for automated testing and how it is going to eliminate manual testers at all. This may not be very true, especially the need for independent software testing companies can never be overlooked.
Although we can expect the future to be overloaded with automation including robotic process automation, machine learning, and AI, all these are expected to substitute for manual testers. However, no robot is a substitute for the delicate inspection carried out by humans. Following are 9 reasons why manual testing will always remain in the game:
Manual Testing is Cheaper for Small Projects
Small businesses do not usually have a lot of functionalities, and the volume of regression is low. While the ROI is lower as compared to automation testing, it does not make sense to spend a huge amount on automated tests.
Automated Tools Cannot Test for Aesthetics
When it comes to the aesthetics of an application, such as color, size, font, contrast, etc. this cannot be maintained by an automated algorithm. It is only possible for a human to determine whether the desired color matches client requirements. Thus, independent software testing companies ensure that they provide manual and automated testing services.
Humans Understand Better than Machines
When it comes to uncovering various user motivations, including behavioral insights, they reveal why certain functions are performing well and others are not. From all aspects, manual testers can throw immediate light on what processes customers need and what operations they truly care about. They can identify where developers may be stuck and realize when they shouldn’t give up.
Automated Tests Can Have Flaky Results
When QA managers rely on automated tests, they become too lenient and casual about the test scripts. The analysis of test execution can often be flaky if manual intervention is absent. Thus, it is important to involve manual testing for accurate results.
Automated Tests Don’t Allow Random Testing
Customers do not care about how software testing is performed. They are more concerned about the quality of an application. Thus, manual testers have the ability to check all the functionalities of an application thoroughly and determine if the users can navigate through the apps and its features easily.
Minor Changes Are Easier With Manual Testing
When independent software testing companies perform automation testing, they ensure that they also have their hands-on manual testing. This is necessary for particular, to ensure that minor changes in an application are carried out manually. Testers do not need to run lengthy and costly automated tests for this reason.
All Tests Cannot Be Automated
Automation sounds easy, comfortable and attainable. But these tests are not feasible in the long-run. They do require human intervention since it is not possible to identify all problems automatically. There are some tests that need to be performed manually.